Paul,
Thanks for the quick response, especially on a Sunday morning. I recall reading
the UT-3D document which formed the basis for higher "enlightment" ( I hate that
word) of the interaction betwen the different tones and denisties of carbon ink.
The piece I am thinking about is actually in a footnote of a different document.
The UT-3D document states the same thing though, if there is an increase of a
warm denisty the netutral curve will cause an increase in Lab b* while an
increase in a cool denisty will result in a decrease of Lab b* . The footnote I
am referring to takes it one step further by indicating what denisty adjustments
affect the Lab a* shift of a neutral curve.
My objective is to reach a fairly neutral curve on BFK Rives using the K4
approach minimizing the amount of cool ink I am using. It may be a bridge too
far as the paper starts off fairly warm.
Then again, it could be all of those cigarettes I smoked as a teenager too...
________________________________
From: Paul <roark.paul@...>
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, March 6, 2011 10:06:08 AM
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Adjusting Lab A and Lab B through ink denisty
"grimmieoldfart" <grimmieoldfart@...> wrote:
> I read somewhere and seem to think it is buried in one of Paul's documents
>about adjusting the Lab A and Lab B through the ink denisty settings of
>different inks. ...
This may be what you're thinking of:
http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/UT-3D_Readme.pdf
Paul
www.PaulRoark.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Adjusting Lab A and Lab B through ink denisty
2011-03-06 by Phillip Kimble
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.