Are they vaporous in any way, with possible effects on traditional photographic or inkjet prints? On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Ernst Dinkla <edinkla@...>wrote: > ** > > > On 07/24/2011 07:16 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > > Can anyone explain the difference? > > > > The lowest quality acrylic sheets are made in an extrusion process from > molten acrylic pellets and will show stria in the sheet, less even > surfaces, etc if compared to cast acrylic sheets. The last produced as > in mold (between glass) polymerised acrylic that is considered the best > optical quality plastic available. Styrene transparent sheets are always > produced as an extrusion directly from molten styrene pellets.With > polystyrene the optical effects are worse and its surface will scratch > faster. Polystyrene will yellow in time and usually its optical quality > is also reduced if it has to have more impact strength by adding other > components. For example the ABS qualities. There are copolymeres of > styrene and acrylic but they still do not deliver the quality of cast PMMA. > > -- > Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst > > Try: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Wide_Inkjet_Printers/ > > | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | > | www.pigment-print.com | > | ( unvollendet ) | > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Acrylic vs styrene for framing
2011-07-25 by Lew Schwartz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.