On 17/09/2011 tom.maugham wrote: > Hmmm, and for years I've been told that the holes in the printhead of > dye printers are too small for pigment inks and will clog more. > After the first few months I had interminable clog problems with 1160 & 1290, using Piezo BW and Generations G4 respectively. This was due to clogging of the microfilters which are internal to the heads (just below the spigots that penetrate the cartridges) and not designed to cope with pigment. Their job is to prevent any particulates reaching the nozzles that might cause blockages. Of course dyes shouldn't have any, but pigments /are/ fine particulates and much more likely to block the filters over time and restrict ink supply. I suspect I made matter worse by intermittent use, which probably allowed the pigments to settle. The 1290 (with G4) was worst, it killed 2 heads in 18m. It was not the nozzles that blocked, but ink starvation during printing would mean that the first half of the first print would be fine, and then degrade rapidly with no consistency to which nozzles appeared "blocked". Attempting to clean them only resulted in more nozzles becoming starved of ink. If I left it alone for a day or two, enough ink would pass the filters to print another half page... I tried backflushing the filters several times, but that never really worked. I scrapped both printers, plus CIS, plus inks, after they became unusable. The alternative, 90GBP a time for a DIY-fitted new head every few months, was not something I could put up with; it was just a very expensive mistake. I'd be quite wary now of using pigments in printers designed for dyes. -- Regards Tony Sleep http://tonysleep.co.uk
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Epson 1400
2011-09-19 by Tony Sleep
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.