"John" <jrnolly@...> wrote: > > Yes, film is mostly more permanent, but more precisely "universal". You don't need any special equipment to look at the image. ... I'm going to make a set of prints on 13 x 19 as the "archival" storage medium for the museum project I seem to always be working on. I looked at the various options for printing and, while glossy had the best signal to noise ratio, a cotton paper was chosen for permanence. I wonder how the collectors look at all of this. Will our really good carbon on cotton prints have more value if there is NO forever backup? Sometimes an artist's work goes up Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: Slightly OT - Millenniata - permanent storage?
2011-11-19 by Paul