Digital BW, The Print

>In a message dated 2/28/2002 12:22:56 AM Eastern Standard Time,
>phil@... writes:
>
>
>>  Vintage is still king, and
>>  as yet there are no true vintage digital's out there.
>
>I remember reading in an article a while back that AIPAD considered a vintage
>print  one which was made within five years after creation of the negative.
>(At this point I  imagine within five years of the file would be similar).
>If that is the case, the prints we are making now, from files and negs which
>are less than five years old, should be considered vintage prints.
>I remember seeing prints at aipad which were only a few years old being
>referred to as vintage.
>George J Kunze
>
>

Great idea!. I mean let's have some fun with this precious 
institution we call the photo gallery system.  Starting today, I am 
labeling my prints as "vintage carbon based pigment prints".
-- 

b i l l  a g e e  s t u d i o
c a p i s t r a n o  b e a c h  c a l i f o r n i a

billagee@...
http://www.redsilver.com
http://www.billageestudio.com