David Yes, perhaps that's another point to consider, although that's a different issue to cropping the larger image and keeping the same ppi with the cropped image, wouldn't you agree. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Cdtobie <CDTobie@...> wrote: > > >>> I am struggling with this issue also. I have pre-ordered the 36MP Nikon but am re-considering the need. Generally speaking it is a straight line function of 3 to translate the MP number to PSD size. So 36 goes to 108Mb 8 bit and 216Mb 16 bit. > > >I haven't examined all of the specs of this camera, but perhaps it's possible to capture in smaller RAW modes and using the full RAW size when needed. > > That misses one of the point:; putting in more pixels, then throwing away some of them loses the dynamic range that not increasing the pixel count, and using all the light that hits the sensor allows. > > C. David Tobie > Global Product Technology Manager > Imaging Color Solutions > Datacolor inc. > cdtobie@... > www.datacolor.com > > On Mar 10, 2012, at 12:05 PM, "Don" <donsbryant@...> wrote: > > > > I am struggling with this issue also. I have pre-ordered the 36MP Nikon but am re-considering the need. Generally speaking it is a straight line function of 3 to translate the MP number to PSD size. So 36 goes to 108Mb 8 bit and 216Mb 16 bit. > > > > > > > I haven't examined all of the specs of this camera, but perhaps it's possible to capture in smaller RAW modes and using the full RAW size when needed. >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-11 by Mel
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.