Canon aren't done yet...The 5D III met the wishes of a very large number of pros and prosumers alike but there's a high MP camera on its way for those wanting more resolution and prepared to sacrifice speed for it. On 13 Mar 2012, at 05:34, Joseph DiLorenzo wrote: > Hi all, > > A lurker here, and perhaps a bit late to the discussion, but thought you > guys might be interested in an article I just read that discusses some > of the things being discussed here. > > http://www.bobatkins.com/photography/technical/pixel_matters.html > > Bob Atkins compares the new Canon 5D Mark III with the Nikon D800 in > terms of pixel size and pixel count as well as other factors. It makes > for an interesting read. I myself was personally looking to Canon for a > larger pixel count as I have the MKII and wanted to upgrade. Nikon > caught my attention and interests me now. However, most of what I do is > available light in low light situations with some studio. So....? Just > thinking out loud here, but the Canon may be more suitable for me IF the > gain in IQ (re: dynamic range and low noise) in low light is really > significant compared to the MKII. > > Joe [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-13 by Steve Kale
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.