Digital BW, The Print

Sorry that 1 got away from me. Obviously as cone said it was loaded with dye  
and didn't have much fade resistance but it was fine behind glass and  
moderately lit areas. As paul said the results weren't as dramatic as you  
might think but it did help in images that required a lot of shadow  
separation. 

Tom Mallonee 

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID

-----Original message-----
From: Tom Mallonee <tom@...>
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, Mar 18, 2012 16:01:45 PDT
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Matte paper dmax 2.05

I got the same results years ago with cone's black-black on photorag. 

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID

-----Original message-----
From: John <jrnolly@...>
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, Mar 18, 2012 15:20:05 PDT
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Matte paper dmax 2.05

2.05 DMax on art paper? Wow, I didn't think that possible Paul! Do the  
blacks have slight sheen to them, or are they perfectly matte? 

John Nollendorfs

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...>  
 
wrote:
>
> I'm profiling Hahnemuhle Photo Rag with the 4000 and the dyes at the  
moment.  The HPR box had an old test strip from the C88 test of the dyes.   
The dmax on the thoroughly dry and cured HPR with Noritsu dye is now 2.05  
(Lab L = 8.06).  I always wondered if one could even see the difference  
between a 1.75 and 2.05 dmax.  Under good lighting I can.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]