"footboard" is supposed to read "foamboard". That was a because spellcheck changed it and I did not catch it. Sorry for any confusion. With this method the prints are not 'framed' but they are on a firm backing. Usually two clips at just the top to clip the print to the foamboard and to serve as hangers. Likely too primitive in many cases but inexpensive. kb Sent from my iPhone On Mar 20, 2012, at 5:49 AM, "Geraldine l" <gpowell@...> wrote: > I also need to find an inexpensive way to mount 16x20 prints. I have not done it before. I wonder if Paul could explain in excruciating detail where to buy the clip frames, what sort of paper to put on the back and how to use spacers? > > Also, I did not understand the reference to "footboard" in the description of the foamboard idea. Does it refer to the bottom of the frame? Wouldn't two binder clips at the bottom look strange? > > I have searched the net for a cheap way to get a professional looking presentation, but can't find anything for someone who isn't a woodworker. > > Geraldine > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Cheap and possibly reversible way of mounting 22 by 30 Arches watercolor
2012-03-20 by KERRY BROOKS
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.