Jennifer, here's my take on the carbon print value issue. A print's value is determined by the market. The market consists of all the potential buyers of our prints. Many of these individual buyers are, more often than not, habitual. The baggage they carry includes perceptions, preconceived notions, and old habits that are really difficult to change. There has to be one or more reasons for each individual buyer to change his/her habits. A market like ours does change, not so much because the individual buyers change their likes and dislikes, but because the newcomers to the market have different likes and dislikes (and probably an entirely different perspective) than the old-timers who are leaving the market. As long as silver prints are available, the inroads that carbon prints make into that traditional silver print market will probably be slow. However, the relative values of various types of prints is almost guaranteed to change simply because the individuals who make up the market change over time. The newcomers may have just as much baggage as the old-timers, but it'll be different because the newcomers' life experiences and perspective on the market will be different. And the values they place on the prints they buy are likely to be different as well. Consider the effort Heinz is making to sell green and purple ketchup. They're selling (presumably) to the buyers of red ketchup. It's just a matter of substitution. Why should a buyer of ketchup switch from the traditional red ketchup? How many traditional red ketchup users are likely to switch, even temporarily? Why should they switch, as long as the traditional red ketchup is available? Some of us may place a higher value on the red ketchup simply because we are familiar with it, or for other reasons that have nothing at all to do with the quality of the product. Another way to look at this: Markets have momentum and can be as difficult to turn as a supertanker. Changing our print market (and the relative values of the products within it) quickly would require that we change the minds of the majority of print buyers regarding the relative merits of the available products. That's not a small task. Each of us has a method of determining value and we each do it somewhat differently. Ultimately, it's the aggregation of our individual valuations that determines the market valuation. I think we just have to be patient... Tom Keesling Intelligent Design, Inc. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "jennifer drucker" <jdrucker@j...> wrote: > Some additional thoughts... > > So why, other than a bit of time, and the fact that one is done in the dark with chemcials, the other in daylight with inks is a digital print any less valuable than that of a silver print? I may understand it 10 years from now when there are fewer and fewer silver prints being made thus making them rare, but right now I just don't see it.
Message
Re: Some additional thoughts Carbon v. Silver
2002-03-03 by inteldes
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.