On 06/01/2012 04:32 PM, Terry Ritz wrote: > On 12-06-01 1:33 AM, "Ernst Dinkla" <e.dinkla@... > <mailto:e.dinkla%40onsneteindhoven.nl>> wrote: > > > There is another way to get the Lab b on a zigzag course. Measure a > > target with heavy bronzing and the 45/0 degree reflection optics in a > > spectrometer are affected by the bronzing layers. The measured color is > > not 1:1 to what the eye sees in color of the bronzing but that is > > understandable given the spectrocam's light source and sensor as another > > light + another observer. In practice one would not select a B&W > > paper/ink combination that creates that much bronzing but in color > > printing it may be less obvious and play a role when colors are off > > after profiling. Grey range in color prints for example. I will put some > > QTR linearisation plots on my site to show the difference between a > > target with and without bronzing. > > Not that's very interesting, and something well worth keeping in mind. > > Would L* values suffer in this circumstance? > > Terry. Hardly I think. The 21 B&W step range is as good as the one that has no bronzing. Same paper, different inkset. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst Dinkla Grafische Techniek Quad, pi\ufffdzografie, gicl\ufffde www.pigment-print.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Invalid linearize curve -- not constantly increasing
2012-06-01 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.