Digital BW, The Print

Jimbo and Mark, I have certainly done it both ways and I base my decision on
needed end result. If I know it's going to be going big and needs all the
sharpness it has to offer, I don't use ICE. It also is based on other
shooting ideas, is it a portrait, landscape, etc. ICE will most certainly
require a stronger dose of sharpening later. I have been toying with
converting from my Nikon 9000 to a 800E. 
 
Eric Neilsen
Eric Neilsen Photography
4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9
Dallas, TX 75226
 
www.ericneilsenphotography.com
skype me with ejprinter
Let's Talk Photography
 
  _____  

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Mark
Savoia
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 8:00 AM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Pacific Image Scanners
 
  
True it does lose a bit of sharpness but I would rather spend 10 seconds
applying sharpening then 60 minutes retouching out scratches. But that is
just me, we scan many old slides from clients who stored them in basements,
attics, back seat of car, in underwear drawer (you get the point).

Mark
http://www.stillrivereditions.com

On Jul 20, 2012, at 8:49 AM, jimbo wrote:

> Mark,
> Ice is handy that's for sure but using it actually takes the overall scan
quality backwards.. If you scan a slide with it turned off an dthen again
turned on it's visible ..But yes less work..
> 
> jimbo



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]