David- It gets more complex than that. The glass adds others factors too. I won't get into that physics. If I know where the print will go, I'll print for that lighting. However, I don't think any place outside of a gallery or museum has a constant light source (deg-K, etc.). One of my viewing sources is an overhead light with tungsten, A Reveal bulb and a warm flourescent on at the same time. The highlight/shadow behind glass is something else you would print for--if you know. But what glass? The matte print will still diffract and refract before bouncing the light back out. That may cause some of the appearance of better "blacks." Behind glass or not; multiple lighting or not -- I still prefer the "richness" of a matte print over the "brilliance" of gloss. But, that's a battle that will never end. One thing I would LOVE to see is an original Ansel Adams, Minor White, etc. print both out of glass and behind it at the same time. Seth
Message
Re: Dmax in perspective -- the mirror with a reflective "density" of 1.75
2012-10-16 by Seth Rossman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.