Digital BW, The Print

Scott, you can't get a print from an inkjet that looks EXACTLY like a photo print. For fine art printing, I think the thousands of different
watercolor papers available  leave the darkroom papers in the dust. You have maybe 10 surfaces in the darkroom, and thousands of papers for
inkjet.  I'm getting great prints from your basic setup, except I have the 1280 printer. With Paul's curves and the VM inkset, what more
could you want? Try Bright cube's Eclipse Satine Paper. It is thick, and luxurious. Watercolor textured on one side, and smooth on the
other. You can print either side. Comes in 2 weights, 190 gsm, and 300 gsm. Beautiful paper.

Jerry

>
> The gain in using glossier, coated papers is that the
> blacks (lower zones) have a depth I have yet to see in
> matte, archival-er inkjet prints. I haven't seen many
> professional inkjet prints, though. This is the
> problem I need to solve in my work before I will
> exclaim that my inkjet prints are equal to traditional
> darkroom prints.
>
> I use MIS VM, epson 870, epson archival matte paper,
> Roark curves.
>
> I hope someone will set me straight and tell me that
> my curves need tweaking or I'm exhibiting some
> oversight/lack of inkjet experience (maybe both,
> surely the latter!).
>
> I agree that time will change the value of inkjet
> prints. I believe it is simply a perception issue
> stemming from associations with the poorer quality
> prints created by so many for so many different, many
> non-artistic, purposes in offices and homes across the
> world.
>
> It took a lot for photography to be somewhat accepted
> in the fine art world and the use of inkjet prints may
> trigger lingering suspicions in some regarding the
> validity of this printing process. It's just another
> change and it's hard for some to deal with. Also, when
> something is perceived as easier to produce it has
> less value. It's perceived that way because of the
> industry marketing and the associated consumer digital
> tools. In the end, really good inkjet printers
> (people) will be respected as much as their
> counterparts in the "dark".
>
> Perhaps one way of helping change this perception is
> to not draw attention to the printing process in
> exhibits. Is there another word for the process that
> would help seperate it from being associated with the
> printers that everyone has in their offices? How many
> darkroom exist in homes and offices? Piezo sounds
> pretty mysterious and difficult to learn!? I'm not
> kidding.
>
> Better stop, now. just some thoughts.
>
> --- Todd Flashner <tflash@...> wrote:
> >
> > > So why, other than a bit of time, and the fact
> > that one is done in the dark
> > > with chemcials, the other in daylight with inks is
> > a digital print any less
> > > valuable than that of a silver print? I may
> > understand it 10 years from now
> > > when there are fewer and fewer silver prints being
> > made thus making them rare,
> > > but right now I just don't see it.
> >
> > Maybe it's that further prints from the darkroom
> > will all have subtle
> > variations between them, as it's unlikely that a
> > person has the precision
> > for repeatability that a machine has, making each
> > darkroom print, however so
> > slightly, different from the next?
> >
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
> http://mail.yahoo.com/
>
>
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
>
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage.
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/