--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" <mwesley250@e...> wrote: > Jim, > > I have found this to be pretty common with 1280 prints. On mine it seems to > come and go, and is very image dependent. Only shows up in very smooth > tones. I find it much less noticeable than the light microscopic banding I > got with my 1200. Thank you for your reply, Martin. Yes, it has only started doing it today. I have a print with LOTS of k in it, like 92-98%k. I printed it a few weeks ago, no problem, beautiful. I compare it to a print done today, same settings, everything else the same (btw I'm using curves I got from Paul for printing at 2880 dpi- so I'm at that resolution printing this both times)- cordury. It vanishes lighter than about 90%k. > > I have let bottles get very low. In fact the yellow ran empty not too long > ago and I had no banding problems. The pressure head of a non CIS cart vs a CIS/CFS bottle would work different I bet, but my head hurts too much right now to think about it<g>. > > I have about 90 exchange prints now and if you get out a magnifying loupe > you will find linear artifacts on a great many of them. This spans all of > the printer models from the 1160 to the 7000. It does seem to be driver, > paper and image dependent to varying degrees. I think you have a good point. In the past I've overlooked things I can't see without a loupe. > > If you can only see it under magnification or at unusually close viewing > distances I don't worry about it. It's visable a good foot away under a good quality Ott-lite, no loupe. Very apparent when comparing to print I did some weeks ago. But we may still be talking borderline maybe for most folks. I have stopped looking for this type of > thing and I am much happier. I'll show it to a person or two and see if they catch it. If it is visible at normal distances then all > you can do is go through the normal alignment and cleaning procedures. Nozzles checks great before and after. I even take loupes/lighttables to my nozzle checks when in doubt- these look fine. But I think it would be wise to do an alignment, although the lines are parallell to shorter edge. You > have more experience than anyone in cleaning heads and printer. Yeah, unfortunately.<g> Thanks for the advice, much appreciated. Jim H. > > Martin Wesley > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "jimhayes361" <jimhayes@j...> > To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y...> > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 3:03 PM > Subject: [Digital BW] k microbanding 1280 w/ VM > > > > I just picked up a very fine microbanding, really a cordury, parallel > > to shorter edge, but only in shadow areas on Eclipse Satine 190 gm. > > I'm printing using Paul's curves for 2880 dpi. I've never seen this > > before. Only thing I can think of is k cart is a little low at 10% > > left (no CIS or CFS in yet). > > Thoughts? > > Jm H. > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > > - Include your full name with your message. > > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] k microbanding 1280 w/ VM
2002-03-14 by jimhayes361
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.