Digital BW, The Print

You mean it ISN'T three times better? Geeze, their marketing of the '3x' technology 
is working already. They ought to give that marketing guy a bonus.

Greg

> And you're still overstating the quality gain IMO. Yes, it's an
> advance, but it isn't "triple the quality".
> 
> On Monday 18 Mar 2002 5:17 pm, Jerry Olson wrote:
> > Because if the foveon chip was in a nikon or canon camera they would
> > have the triple the quality they could get in an ordinary chip for
> > half the price, just like the sigma/foveon Camera
>