> Carver Mead stated that the equivalent of a 4megapixel bayer type > chip would > be equal to a 12 MP Foveon chip, without any artifacts. He also > stated that > they are currently working with the Adobe folks, so that in the > near future > Photoshop would recognize the Foveon system, and should work seamlessly. > David Ah, more tidbits of...well...misinformation. Does anyone have ANY idea what so ever why Adobe would need to "recognize the Foveon system"? Why wouldn't it just work seamlessly already? It's just data in some image format... There have been different sensor types out for 10+ years, both interline, one shot and scanning...and there hasn't been ANY need to handle the data any differently for these in the past 10 years, now, why, all of a sudden, does someone make some claim that there is a "problem" that never existed before? And, IMO, doesn't exist today. Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Foveon camera
2002-03-20 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.