Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] Foveon camera

2002-03-20 by Pics4U@en.com

Spoken by someone that obviously doesn't have a clue what current digital camera 
'RAW'  format files mean or what can be done with them  when using the proper 
software.

I agree with others about this thread being clearly off topic for this group. Besides, 
it's getting boring. Like trying to pound nails into a steel plate.

There's clearly an agenda at work that doesn't belong here.

> Ah, more tidbits of...well...misinformation.  Does anyone have ANY
> idea what so ever why Adobe would need to "recognize the Foveon
> system"?  Why wouldn't it just work seamlessly already?  It's just
> data in some image format... There have been different sensor types
> out for 10+ years, both interline, one shot and scanning...and there
> hasn't been ANY need to handle the data any differently for these in
> the past 10 years, now, why, all of a sudden, does someone make some
> claim that there is a "problem" that never existed before?  And, IMO,
> doesn't exist today.

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.