Spoken by someone that obviously doesn't have a clue what current digital camera 'RAW' format files mean or what can be done with them when using the proper software. I agree with others about this thread being clearly off topic for this group. Besides, it's getting boring. Like trying to pound nails into a steel plate. There's clearly an agenda at work that doesn't belong here. > Ah, more tidbits of...well...misinformation. Does anyone have ANY > idea what so ever why Adobe would need to "recognize the Foveon > system"? Why wouldn't it just work seamlessly already? It's just > data in some image format... There have been different sensor types > out for 10+ years, both interline, one shot and scanning...and there > hasn't been ANY need to handle the data any differently for these in > the past 10 years, now, why, all of a sudden, does someone make some > claim that there is a "problem" that never existed before? And, IMO, > doesn't exist today.
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Foveon camera
2002-03-20 by Pics4U@en.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.