It strikes me that some of the confusion in this discussion regarding "dynamic range" and "density range" might stem from the fact that, "density range", as used by Austin, is analogous to what "dynamic range" measures in audio technology. At least in my understanding, the "dynamic range" of an audio amplifier has to do with the ratio of maximum signal strength to minimum signal strength. It has nothing to do with the size of steps between them. Or am I missing something here and is "dynamic range" of an amplifier also somehow analogous to the "dynamic range" of a print, and not to a print's density range? -- Herb Sitz --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@i...> wrote: > Right, but the proper term is density range, NOT dynamic range. > > Why, Dynamic Range, of course ;-) That's why the word "dynamic" is > used...which basically means "of or relating to variation of intensity" in > this use. > > BTW, this stuff is just so important to a deeper understanding of quite a > lot of stuff in photography, much less other things in life. At least in my > opinion. >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Dynamic Range
2002-03-25 by hsitz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.