Lines in the sky? Not with my 7000 / Piezo ProB&W. -- Quentin --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@v...> wrote: > What I'm trying to do is find a good way to see how smooth (or not) the > grayscale ramps are on the various inkjet workflows. It is, perhaps, a way > to judge the extent to which the workflow can produce smooth, photographic > prints. > > The procedure I tried here (and would like some feedback on) was to run a > Photoshop gradient at 50% opacity over and the opposite direction of the > 21-step gray scale smooth ramp of the scanned test strips being compared. > The purpose of this procedure is to neutralize the ramp -- except for those > parts of the printed ramp that deviate from the Photoshop gradient ramp that > was used to make the test file in the fist place. What should stand out, I > hypothesize, is the defects in the printing system/workflow. > > To further accentuate the defects/deviations, I increased contrast 90% and > brightness 30%. > > For comparison, I used one Piezo 1160 test strip (Piezo ink and driver ver. > 5.1.3 on EAM with EAM profile) and one test strip printed with the 3000 > using the VM-sepia ink with the neutral curve (a modified vm "warm" curve) > and, of course, the Epson driver. This print was also on EAM. > > Both test strips were then scanned at the same time. (The scanner has a > defect that put 2 lines in the shadows of both test strips. One is in the > 100% patch and one in the 95% patch. They are obvious in the image because > they are the same for each test strip.) > > We are, of course, familiar with the dots that the 3000 has with the Epson > driver, and the dots do stand out. So this comparison shouldn't even be > close. Right? > > Take a look at the scanned image. It is in the Files section, which is at: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > Then go to > Inksets, reviews and techniques and see "Ramp- smoothness.jpg." > > (The full URL is: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/Inkse ts%2C% > 20reviews%20and%20techniques/Ramp-smoothness.jpg > > But Yahoo mail wrecks the ability to click on wrapped URLs.) > > Piezo wins the dot contest easily, but it has lots of vertical lines in it. > Overall, the contest is rather closer than one would expect. > > The reason I originally started making Photoshop curves to print Piezo inks > with the Epson driver was to get smooth skies in some photos that Piezo was > putting lines in. I suspect the vertical lines in this test are what was > causing the trouble with the Piezo outputs. It would be interesting to see > how version 6 and the 7000 Piezo software does. > > Of course, I don't expect to see perfection in any ramp, and I'm sure most > of the vm curves that I've done are even more defective than the one used > here (which is a new one just for the VM-sepia inkset to give a neutral > print). > > I think this test is consistent with the comments we've heard lately > comparing digital and darkroom prints. I think we still have a ways to go. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: Ramp smoothness test -- Piezo 1160 v. Epson 3000
2002-03-27 by qdfb
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.