on 3/28/02 1:22 PM, Martin Wesley wrote: > For my > work I couldn't live with just 256 shades of gray and would still be > sloshing around in the dark. Hmm. Next time you're working a grayscale image on your computer change your monitor from millions of colors to 256 shades of gray and tell me if your image looks any worse for wear. And unless you are printing from images will full histograms, end to end, I'd presume your images to have less than 256 shades of gray. I suppose one could create a white to black gradient in Photoshop, and posterize it into as many steps as they want, print it, and see how many steps they can distinguish. I'd bet somewhere beyond 100 or so either the printing system or our perception would begin to break down. However, any system that can reproduce Tyler's Zees successfully can handle the 100 tones that comprise it, so we know at least that much IS possible today. Todd
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Dynamic Range Definitions and Print Tones
2002-03-28 by Todd Flashner
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.