For some reason yahoo has choosen to repost this? I didn't, has Yahoo gone mad? Barry -- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "flyfishingusa2002" <tflyfish@c...> wrote: > I have been following all the threads regarding "Combing" and "Step- > Wedges" with great interest. I have been looking at there Histograms > in Photoshop and trying to figure out what it was telling me. I have > been seeing a lot of "stray" information in the Histograms that > confused me, so I decided to try the following:- > > 1 I did a selection of just the wedge part of the published > standard Step wedge by Jon Cone and MIS > > 2 I, via PhotoShop 6, drew a simple rectangle filled with a > graduation from 0% - 100% grey. > > Neither of the above gave me a "Clean" Histogram. I fully expected > #2 to do so. I see lots of little comb teeth and a variation in the > histogram height when I thought it should be constant. > > Could it be that the "Combing" is something that Photoshop is > introducing and does not really appear on our finished print? > > I have also noticed that on the step wedge that those little white > dividing lines do not appear between all the steps on some > magnifications and not on others. > > I am no PhotoShop expert, but the above seems a little odd, maybe we > are all being lead astray by PhotoShop? > > Barry
Message
Re: PhotoShop Histograms leading us astray?
2002-03-29 by flyfishingusa2002
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.