Herb, What you say makes sense only if there are a finite number of tones. In a full range continuous tone silver print there are no steps between min and max density but an infinite number of tones. If you can achieve a continuous tone print from a digital source the same would apply there. Which is why photographers have traditionally only looked at the range between Dmin and Dmax as being of interest. The idea of a finite number of tones is something that was born with digital imaging and has mistakenly leaked across into analyzing continuous tone analog images. Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: "hsitz" <hsitz@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 9:19 AM Subject: [Digital BW] Is dynamic range more important than density range? > I've been following (at least trying to follow) the lengthy > discussion over dynamic range vs. density range. > > For my part, Austin has me convinced that proper meaning of 'dynamic > range' of a print has to do with the number of steps available > between its maximum density and a minimum density. Still, it seems > striking to me that the understanding of most non-experts mistakenly (snip earlier)
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Is dynamic range more important than density range?
2002-03-29 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.