On 3/29/02 10:39 AM, "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@...> wrote: >> 1. I now think you do need both density range and dynamic range to >> characterise the tones in a print. Clearly the blackest black is >> important >> and the whitest white is important -- these are measured by their density >> and the difference would be density range. Also the ability to >> render smooth >> transitions from one tone to another across the density range is important >> and this would be measured by Dynamic Range. > > Bingo! And very eloquently worded. I hope it didn't take too many licks to > get there ;-) > >> 4. The dynamic range of my prints (using the piezo driver v5, and epson >> 1200, and MIS FS inks) has a maximum of: >> >> -10log10((measured paper black density)-(measured paper white >> density)/256)) >> >> Since the originating image only contains 256 shades of grey this caps the >> upper limit (ie smallest value of) on the minimum perceptible >> change. > > You are correct, assuming your print HAS 256 tones though. They dynamic > range of the printing system would always be 256 tones, but the print does > not have to contain 256 tonal steps, or 1/256th step per tonal variation. > Printing litho film comes to mind. > >> If my >> eyes can only perceive 100 shades of grey then the dynamic range is lower. > > I don't believe that lowers the dynamic range of the print...it is what it > is. The dynamic range YOU can perceive is lower, no doubt. > When you say "it is what it is" do you mean that given a set of increasingly accurate measuring devices there will be a point where the next most accurate device will not yield a result different from its predecessor? Also, how do you deal with the increasingly precise measurement when the precision of the measurements starts to exceeds 2x (or is it 1/2) the physical characteristics of that which you are measuring (ink droplets, silver grains etc. >> If my eyes can see 1000 shades of grey the dynamic range is still >> capped by >> the 256 shades that the print originated in. > > Very true. > >> To assess whether a silver print has more or less dynamic range you would >> have to use a "system" that can accurately discriminate as many distinct >> tones as our eyes and see if either print reaches its discrimination limit >> before the limit of our eyes is reached. > > Some prints are blatantly obvious though. I don't know that you need to > factor our eyes into this, as you really need to use a measurement technique > that is more accurate than what it is you are trying to measure. As you > have said, our eyes can only distinguish 100 levels of gray (in any one > lighting condition that is). > > Regards, > > Austin > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other > resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Dynamic Range Definitions and Print Tones
2002-03-29 by Kevin Gulstene
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.