Hiiiii Martin ;-) > > > In a > > > full range continuous tone silver print there are no steps between min > and > > > max density but an infinite number of tones. > > > > There certainly aren't an infinite number of tones! > > If you print a continuous gradient on a piece of silver paper > that begins at > paper white and ends at Dmax there are an infinite number of tones within > the range. Absolutely unquestionably incorrect. You would need a piece of paper of infinite size to print infinite tones, even if each tone is the size of one atom. > Or, if you will consider, that the number of tones is so high that you eye > cannot distinguish between adjacent tones so as to simulate a continuous > tone. Well, that isn't hard to do since we already can do that with both inkjet and chemical prints. > What would that mean in terms of your dynamic range equation? Your minimum discernable signal is now the limits of your eye. > Somehow I knew you would. <G> Some people knew about dynamic range long before digital cameras and digital imaging became readily available to "regular" people ;-) > Is that because of the quality of the materials or how they were used? Could be either, and may be something else...and I believe that's image dependant. Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Is dynamic range more important than density range?
2002-03-30 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.