----- Original Message ----- From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 8:00 PM Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Is dynamic range more important than density range? > > > > Martin -- Well, I'd say that what I say makes sense whether there are > > > a finite number of tones or an infinite number that are available in > > > a silver printing process. But that if you think there are an > > > infinite number of tones available to an analog process then you > > > might just think it's silly to try to compare the 'dynamic range' > > > (using Austin's meaning) of the two systems. So you're left with > > > comparing density ranges. > > > > Herb, > > > > That pretty much sums it up form my point of view. > > Then, how do you "describe" the difference in number of tones? That is not > defined by density range. If the mumber of tones is infinite or higher than we can differentiate then the number of tones in not important. > All density range gives you is the lightest and > darkest tone...period You could have an image that has ONLY the lightest > and darkest tone, and no intermediate tones...and then an image that has a > LOT of tones...both with the exact same density range. Well let's say it is a density range where the slope of the tone curve is always less than zero which would be a requirement if the print is continuous tone or simply mimicking continuous tone. Not even grade 5 paper hits a zero slope and not may shot with litho film developed in litho developer, not that I didn't try. > (snip) > > > I think it is an appropriate example and illustrates that my claim of > > infinite tones may be irrelevant once you have reached a number of tones > > where the eye cannot distinguish between two adjacent tones. > > That depends on the print, now doesn't it? Okay limit the discussion to a print that contain a gradient then. If print materials can produce a smooth gradient we generally find that they will give as a good image print. Martin
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Is dynamic range more important than density range?
2002-03-30 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.