> > Then, how do you "describe" the difference in number of tones? That is > not > > defined by density range. > > If the mumber of tones is infinite or higher than we can > differentiate then > the number of tones in not important. You're avoiding the question. Because they are not discernable to YOU does not mean they are not discernable. There are also prints that exist that have a number of tones that we can differentiate. How do you "describe" the difference in number of tones? NOT with density range...but how? You've also shifted the discussion from your original claim, and are now saying dynamic range isn't relevant because we can't see it. The interesting part is, you don't know that we can't see it, and you can't make the claim that we can't see it in EVERY image printed, now can you? ;-)
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Is dynamic range more important than density range?
2002-03-30 by Austin Franklin