----- Original Message ----- From: "antonisphoto" <antonisphoto@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, April 01, 2002 11:42 AM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] What contributes most to image quality? > Martin, > > good point about the format choices in the "darkroom days" - remember > those?? Even 5x7 was prohibitive because it forced either an 8x10 enlarger > or some extinct Durst. > > Now the question is does the baby Howetek cover 8x10 and.... are you > starting to look longingly at a Deardorff? !! <s> > > Antonis > > < oh, but lugging those 8x10 neg holders will kill you...! > > Antonis, Well the Howtek specs say a scanning area of 11x10.2" so in theory it works but I have heard anecdotal comments that it won't. I may find out in a couple of weeks. I think my thoughts are more on trading up from my Canham DLC 4x5 to the Canham MQC 5x7 with the accessory 4x5 back. At least 2 of my 4x5 lens should cover 5x7 and the weight of the film holders does not grow so dramatically as the 8x10's and I could switch to 4x5 if I needed to travel far from my car. All these choices. Its a tough world. <G> Martin (snip)
Message
Re: [Digital BW] What contributes most to image quality?
2002-04-01 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.