Thank you, Roy. -----Original Message----- From: royvharrington [mailto:roy@...] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 5:14 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Thoughts about Imaging --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@i...> wrote: > > What are these "taped and printed discussions of dynamic range as it > relates to prints", aside from discussions posted on a web page, or in > news groups on the Internet? > > BTW, I do understand that people have confused the term dynamic range > when they mean density range, for what ever historical > reason...probably because those doing it didn't really know what > dynamic range was. It is very similar to the misuse of the term > resolution when talking about computer monitors (or digital cameras > ;-). > > Austin Austin, You've pushed you idea on dynamic range for imaging, time and time again. Many people have argued with you. I personally have gone to the library to look at your reference book by "Higgins". First of all I'd like to point out that the formula and the diagrams you have spoken about are under a paragraph heading: 1.4.1 DYNAMIC RANGE EXAMPLE: ANALOG VS. DIGITAL AUDIO. The last word AUDIO is key. You've claim to have 25 years of experience in AUDIO, fine. You've claimed to have taken this formula, plugged in density, and defined dynamic range for imaging. I tried several times to point out that it was at least possible to plug in density to the formula in different ways. You declined to admit that, saying there wasn't any interpretation, mapping, or logic, involved in going from the audio formula to imaging. Well, bottom line is you're mistaken, incorrect, misinformed or whatever you want to call it. I don't expect or even recommend that you believe me. You've got to investigate, research, and learn more about the Imaging World and figure it out for yourself. I'd be glad to help point you in the right direction but you've got to do it yourself. Here's a couple of hints: The formula in Higgins book is about audio, explicitly showing the waveform nature of sound. The signal diagram shows what to measure with a wave. Imaging is very different, when we talk about light intensity, or film density there are no waves. They are direct measured values that can be perceived as constant values. Your interpretation has made density into a waveform property which it is not. Get away from the audio books, jettison the audio baggage. Read some imaging books. Here's a nice one: Read World Scanning and Halftones by Blatner, Fleishman and Roth. -- page 13 direct quote "Dynamic Range" expresses how broad a range of tonal values a scanner can capture; this is similar to the photographic measure of "density". -- page 14 direct quote ... compare bit depth and dynamic range to a staircase: the dynamic range describes the height of the staircase and the bit depth describes the number of steps from the bottom to the top. Read Ansel Adams: The Negative Read the kodak website -- search for dynamic range. Whether you like it or not dynamic range is well used in imaging and your interpretation doesn't agree with the anyone else. If you really like your function call it Austin's Cool Range Formula, and I'm sure we'd all be happy to let you own it. I am sorry to be harsh about it, but I really think the aruments have become a disservice to the group. Regards, Roy Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Thoughts about Imaging
2002-04-04 by Andrew Biggs
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.