> Ratio of minimum and maximum contrast. B-b-b-b-b-but Martin, isn't maximum contrast (dMax - dMin), and minimum contrast the "smallest discernable [tonality]"? > This fulfils the basic definition and is not as obtuse as it would appear > from the DyR equation. For photographic use, I'd agree with that! > The equation is just a subtle change on > the basic max > to min ratio What's the change? The definition of "min" and "max"? <snip> > Austin is > not wrong in > applying his contrast ratio to a photographic print but he has failed to > demonstrate how this would be done or what value it would have when > comparing two printing mediums. For me, that's a separate issue...I wanted to get to the point where the basic concept was understood first. I take it you now understand/agree with the statement "dynamic range of a photographic image is (maximum contrast / minimum contrast)", and not the same as the density range? Regards, Austin
Message
RE: For Roy Re: [Digital BW] Thoughts about Imaging
2002-04-04 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.