At the risk of prolonging the interminable argument that has developed around this topic, I offer an illustration of how Austin's concepts might have "real world" relevance. Some years ago, before I retired, I worked with a medical illustrator and was required to make photographic copies of her beautifully rendered 'carbondust' drawings. The differences in the gray tones in these black and white works were so subtle that I was having difficulty, within the normal workflow of our busy photo lab, in capturing them precisely. After many frustrating attempts, I was finally able to explain my problem to her in terms she could understand and to request her cooperation. I produced a print of a stepwedge on normal contrast photo paper and taped it to the edge of her drawing board. I explained that it would make my life easier if she would constrain the tones in her drawings to ones on the strip. Using a tone that fell between the steps would be difficult for me to copy exactly. Not knowing a terminology for these concepts, I referred to the difference between the darkest and the lightest tones as "external contrast" and the difference between adjacent tones as "internal contrast." The proverbial 'lightbulb' went on over her head and she said henceforth she would follow my suggestion. Cephalis
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Thoughts about Imaging
2002-04-05 by cephalis
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.