> In our multitude of discussions, I never considered assuming > all the steps would be the same. And I think your > extensive audio experience lead you to assume there > was "some" fixed step size. Actually, more accurately, all > the formulas that you brought over had the fixed step > size builtin long, long ago -- no need to ever worry about > variable size steps in audio. Thanks for putting that into a useful perspective Roy. That spoke to the concept on linearity vs non-linearity I kept referring to, but I don't think I ever explained it in an understandable way. You did. Todd
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Thoughts about Imaging
2002-04-07 by Todd Flashner