Steve, Try Dick Blick art supplies. http://www.dickblick.com/ The system I last used was two part. The first and critical part is a sealer coat and the second is the actual varnish. As a sealer "Morrison's Mix": 1 part Golden Acrylic Medium Gloss 1 part Golden GAC 700 1 part water As a varnish: 1 part dilute Golden Acrylic Flow Release (1 part Release to 4 parts water) 2 parts Golden Polymer Varnish UVLS Use distilled water. You may need to play with the dilution rates depending upon the paper you want to coat. See: Files > Coating inkjet prints Parts 3 and 4. Martin Wesley http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "steven0356" <stevenr@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 4:22 PM Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Coating revisited > Marin > > Were did you get Golden water based acrylic vanishe and how did you > apply it? > > Steve > > > > --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "Martin Wesley" < > mwesley250@e...> wrote: > > Paul, > > > > I have done a bit of laminating for mundane purposes such as Photo ID badges > > and signs. Basically the Dmax goes up, the photos are very well protected > > and they look like they have been, well, plastic laminated. Not very > > appealing I am afraid. > > > > If you are interested in this then look to companies that sell products to > > the sign making industry, which is very inkjet oriented. You can get small > > size laminating equipment and supplies from places like Office Max. > > > > The Golden coatings Robert and I tried were the water based acrylic vanishes > > and so the odor is low and the cure times shorter. Robert and Mark tried the > > Golden solvent base varnishes and found them difficult to work with in part > > due to the long dry time. > > > > You will never remove a coating from an ink jet print. It will soak into the > > paper. What you can do is create an initial sealer coat over which you apply > > the final varnish. It would be conceivable to remove the upper coats without > > harming the lower ones and then replace the upper ones as is done in > > painting. This is only something that would be done if the upper coating was > > damaged. If this were the case an uncoated print by comparison would be in > > very bad shape. > > > > I have seen heavily varnished albumen prints from the 1870's and the varnish > > appeared to be in very good condition. The overall effect of the print was > > rather yellow and may in part be the result of the varnish yellowing. None > > of the materials available at that time for varnishing come close to the > > quality of things like the Golden acrylics so keep that in mind. > > > > My though is that a well varnished inkjet print will most likely out last > > those that are not coated. It is more a question of whether you like the > > effect or not. > > > > Martin Wesley > > http://www.borderless-photos.de/guests.html > > > > > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Coating revisited
2002-04-14 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.