Hello All, Have read and absorbed the obvious expertise of many list members for a while now, read the FAQ section, etc., and feel like I am witnessing the early stages of an exciting new technology. However, to follow this forum, one definitely gets the impression that black & white inkjet printing as it stands today too often succeeds only in spite of itself. Head clogs...air bubbles...color changes and permanence issues... Fantastik(?!)...a workflow that seems neither intuitive nor WYSIWYG when compared to color inkjet or darkroom printing...perhaps it's the natural tendency of these groups to focus on the problems, but the picture I get of this process is of a temperamental and not yet reliable system. I know that some members of this list appear to be getting excellent results, but from what I've seen, this seems to be primarily more "fine art"-style photogs who spend a considerable amount of time finessing each print vs. the inherently faster pace of portrait work, etc. Here's my situation: Although I have a quote-unquote "real job" (translation: depressingly non-photography related), I manage to run a growing photo biz doing primarily candid, available light portrait work, with an ongoing goal of making more from my "fine art" stuff. At this point, I can get the improved control & consistent quality results I want in my portrait work through scanning & Photoshop, then taking the files to our excellent local service bureau for output on a ZBE Chromira printer. To my eye, this process produces prints that equal or beat traditional wet enlarger-based prints, quickly, with none of the issues of inkjets. The problem, of course, is the extra time and lower profit from having to markup service bureau prints. (For my clients, printing larger than 8x10" is rarely an issue, so I can still manage SOME profit....) So my question is, for a photographer who must regularly produce high-quality B&W prints, on a deadline, with consistent and predicable results, smooth skintones and at least the permanence of a traditional enlarger print, is ANY form of B&W inkjet printing yet up to the task? I don't want to just debate the theory, but actually hear from those who a) are successfully using this system for portrait work and/or a quicker turnaround type of photo business; or b) those who tried it but felt they needed to use some other non-inkjet system to meet their needs. Please note that I have nothing but the highest respect for Paul Roark and everyone else on this list who are doing so much to advance this field. I am not so naive as to expect a solution to fall into my lap with no effort on my part; just not sure that this particular process is yet a good match for my particular needs. Believe me, I hope I AM wrong about this, as I would much prefer to be doing it myself! Thanks, Doug
Message
BW inkjet "ready for prime time" (at least for portrait photogs)?
2002-04-15 by Doug I.
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.