>Good luck. > >Todd Well, luck apparently isn't with me. Having spent most of yesterday gathering wisdom from all of you, I went home full of hope to apply it. I set the Photoshop Color Settings to "Photoshop 5 Default Spaces." I sharpened the image a bit more than seemed advisable. I even tried converting the RGB image to 16 bits per channel. Everything I printed out looked pretty much the same as before. I think the problem is that I just don't like the way the Epson 1160 driver lays down whatever is in the CMY cartridge. It is, after all, the Epson driver that's doing the work: it has no idea what's in the cartridge, or what unusual curves may have been applied to the image. The Epson driver uses widely-spaced dots of ink to render very light tonalities, and I believe it "cheats" by laying down what I see as "patches" of ink in areas where there is very little variation in tonality. The result is so different from what I understand as a "photograph" -- tiny bits of deepest-possible black on white paper -- that I cannot accept it as output for my pictures. This leaves me back where I started from, i.e. either using only the black cartridge, or finding an acceptable substitute for Piezo inks and exporting through the Piezo driver. Either way, I need better inks. For black-only, I want the intensity of the Epson OEM black cartridge with better stability, at least behind glass or in a plastic sleeve in the dark. (Fade resistance on a south-facing windowsill or the back shelf of the car is not relevant: people who subject my prints to that sort of treatment deserve what they get.) By "stability" I mean not so much archival life as some assurance that the image tone and color will not radically fade or shift on a time scale of weeks to months after printing. Does such a beast exist? If not, how close to the Dmax of Epson black can I get? Another useful piece of information would be the intensity sequence of the paper profiles in the Epson Print dialog, i.e. which paper setting lays down the most ink, and which the least. I know this was discussed a few weeks ago, but I can't find the information. Thanks for any pointer to archives, etc. If Piezo, then I need to find out if the MIS Full-Spectrum set will work with the Piezo driver. If it does, then its image tone needs to be considered, and adjusted if necessary by tinting with color ink. Laborious, but a possible medium-term solution. Whatever I do, or any of us does, is in any case going to be superseded in a matter of months. I cannot imagine that Jon Cone and even Epson are standing still; I also cannot imagine that every single photographer investigating digital output is striving for the same smooth, warm, pseudo-platinum look of present-day quadtone methods. 35mm photographers, arise! You have nothing to lose but your developer stains! Any advice on nice black inks will be much appreciated. Thanks again to all of you for your time and attention. -- Nick NICHOLAS HARTMANN +1 (414) 271-4890 611 N. Broadway, Suite 509 fax: +1 (414) 271-4892 Milwaukee, WI 53202, USA polyglot@... Technical and scientific translator: German and French -> English
Message
Re: [Digital BW] More quadtone experiences
2001-08-23 by Nicholas Hartmann
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.