At 10:36 AM -0400 4/26/02, Shire,Stanley wrote: >Another vote for "bigger is better." I am making (mostly landscape) >images with a Mamiya 7II. The camera is light (no mirror, no prism; just >a beautiful, bright rangefinder camera). The 6x7 negs (scanned at home >on an Epson 1640 with trans adapter) and Silverfast print beautifully. >Sharp, sharp, sharp. >Although I use my CP5000 for some stuff, the M7 gets most of the >"serious" work. > I must have missed the first message in this thread, but it seems to be a discussion about everyone's choice of format and why. I think I will go "against the grain"...and vote for 35mm...or maybe I might better say "with the grain." While I own high quality professional 4x5 and 2 1/4 outfits which I occasionally use for professional work requiring detail or camera movements, I must confess that I am a 35mmm photographer in my soul. I hate to use tripods and like the rapid visualization and discovery that only small format can give. Smaller is better for me. I hate to lug around lots of equipment. Also, to my eyes, the abstract quality of grain is a big plus. Infrared is a specialty of mine and it certainly doesn't look real in the sense that Tri-x does. In the future, I will most likely go all digital...as Photoshop is a big part of my routine now. I have been a part-time college photography teacher for about 18 years, mostly black and white and for the last three have been only teaching the Digital Imaging (Photoshop) class. I will probably make the switch to all digital when the 35mm professional cameras have larger capture devices and a 20mm lens takes a 20mm image and not a 28mm image. Actually I like the idea of shooting everything in color and converting in Photoshop to get zthe effect I like. This is similar to what a lot of people are doing with color negative film for black and white final prints. All formats are wonderful in the right hands. I certainly admire other photographers work with large formats, but I can shoot a roll of 35 in the time most 4x5 people set up a camera for their first shot. I like that variety and the process of discovery that comes with it. It all simply boils down to a one's personality, temperament and individual aesthetic. Bill Agee -- b i l l a g e e s t u d i o c a p i s t r a n o b e a c h c a l i f o r n i a billagee@... http://www.redsilver.com
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Film cameras and negatives
2002-04-26 by Bill Agee
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.