>I have a few of Todd's prints. If you aren't happy with them, then I >would suspect that quad inkjet printing may not be what you want to >use. > >Most people who are moving to inkjet from smooth silver prints face a >major adjustment. While the majority of the people on the list are >working very hard and successfully with inkjet, there are going to be >people who will be happier staying with silver or pursuing one the >other digital approaches. > >At least after seeing Todd's prints you will know whether you have a >tech problem or if the medium just can't provide the results you are >looking for. Martin - You may very well be right. I think my problem is that while every approach to inkjet output of photographs that I've tried so far -- black-only, MIS VM, Piezo -- differs from (OK, falls short of) a real photograph, the black-only method at least fails in a familiar way: the highlights can be coarse, the tonal range gets short and/or funky. The mottling that I'm seeing (I repeat, that -> I <- am seeing) with MIS VM is like nothing I've ever seen in a photograph. (Bear in mind that I shoot 35mm only, and that I quite like little black dots on a white background.) Maybe people who use nothing but medium and large format haven't seen film grain in years, and the particular tonal characteristics of MIS VM are unobjectionable -> TO THEM. In any case, I eagerly look forward to seeing Todd's prints. If they look perfect to me, of course, then I'm back to figuring out what exactly I'm doing wrong... Thanks again for helping, -- Nick NICHOLAS HARTMANN +1 (414) 271-4890 611 N. Broadway, Suite 509 fax: +1 (414) 271-4892 Milwaukee, WI 53202, USA polyglot@... Technical and scientific translator: German and French -> English
Message
Re: [Digital BW] More quadtone experiences -- Black ink
2001-08-23 by Nicholas Hartmann
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.