Digital BW, The Print

Wrong E-mail
--- Thom McGraw <thom@...> wrote:
> Hi Gregory,
> 
> I certainly agree that the SG inks produce very 
> good
> prints.  I just could not endure my lovely warm
> prints
> turning green as soon as the sun shone through a
> window.  And, I was buying cartridges back when they
> cost over $70 a pair, so you can imagine how costly
> multiple cleaning cycles were.
> 
> By the way, on which type of paper do you print? 
> When
> I printed on matte paper (my personal preference) I
> only used EAM, which, as I understand it, is not
> considered lightfast with dye inks.
> 
> I have since reprinted my faded SG prints with MIS
> FS
> inks.  They have warmed a bit, but I do like warm
> prints - unlike that guy from Grand Forks <G>.
> 
> Thom
> 
> --- kdidhjhu <kdidhjhu@...> wrote:
> > 
>  I on the other hand, have not had your 
> > experience with these. The Small Gamut inksets
> have
> > produced beautiful toned prints for me. I will
> admit
> > that 
> > the neutral Quads do have fairly strong metamerism
> > and as result it was one of the reasons I moved to
> > the SG 
> > set. As for clogs, I haven't seen any with my
> 1200, 
> > and really don't expect to as these are dye based
> > inks. I 
> > will keep my eyes pealed
> > though.
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> > Gregory Edwards/Toronto
> 
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com