Jerry wrote: >It doesn't matter WHEN you convert to rgb, >the file just has to in that format when you print it. >You don't have to convert it first to grayscale! Jerry, I think this could be a problem in this context. As I understand it the originals are old photos. They often have some color, including yellowing, stains, etc. As such, that color might affect the variable-tone allocation of inks, resulting in some weird tones or color casts. The recommendation to scan in RGB, even if the ultimate product is a B&W, is often to get as much bit-depth as possible. This recommendation was commonly made some time ago when most scanners only had 8-bit B&W. With higher-bit grayscale scanners, I think most would now recommend scanning in high bit g/s if the original is strictly a B&W. However, there may be another reason to scan in RGB for old photos. The color information can help in eliminating the stains. In any case, I think you should go through a g/s stage to be sure you are not carrying color information over to the final printing RGB. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Question Regarding MIS VT-Ink/Roark Workflow
2001-08-23 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.