Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] acid free Epson paper?

2002-05-05 by Robert Morrison

Its interesting to note that in their new brochure on the Ultrachrome inks
that Epson only rates Enhanced Matte (the EAM sequel) at 30 years while
"Fine Art Papers" are rated at 90-100 years.  I think that is probably
reflective of how Epson views the paper.  But then again its 1/4 the price
of good paper...and only 1/3 of the life...so I guess it is a good deal!

Robert

On 5/4/02 11:55 PM, "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> wrote:

> bjornaagedk wrote:
>> 
>> Hi everyone!
>> 
>> Do someone know if Epson's Archival Matte paper is 100% acid
>> free?
> 
> This debate has raged on several forums, and I'm not sure we have a good
> answer to the more difficult question of whether EAM can be expected to last
> for long enough to be considered "archival" -- whatever that means.
> 
> (I've never seen Epson admit that they changed the name due to concerns
> about pigments on EAM not being "archival."  The concern I've seen from
> Epson related only to the dye-based inks not being particularly long-lasting
> on EAM, and, this I believe, has nothing to due with acid in the paper.  The
> EAM surface is optimized for pigments, not dyes.  On the other hand, I
> strongly suspect that Epson really changed the name to avoid having to
> substantiate the representation that EAM was "archival.")
> 
> At any rate, I have used one of the acid-testing pens on a number of papers.
> EAM does appear to have some acid in its base.
> 
> So, it is not "acid free."
> 
> But whether enough acid in the paper to do significant, long-term damage may
> be a much more difficult question. I believe EAM is made of wood pulp that
> has had the lignin removed.  So, it is lignin free, and lignin is apparently
> the source of most of the acid in modern wood-pulp papers.  (The older pulp
> processing apparently used acid, but I beleive such processes are no longer
> used for good, wood-pulp paper.)
> 
> Cotton is the purest natural source of cellulose.  So, it is the starting
> material that is traditionally preferred for archival paper.  However,
> whether modern, lignin-free wood-pulp can make equally-pure or pure enough
> cellulose is unclear to me.  I assume that cellulose is the same chemical no
> matter whether it is from trees or cotton.
> 
> I might add that the acid-testing pen appears to be easily fooled by cheap
> buffering.  As such, cheap newspaper that yellows and deteriorates quickly
> tests out with the pen as more acid-free than my fiber-based,
> archivally-processed silver prints.
> 
> The fiber-based silver prints are probably not buffered, because such would
> be inconsistent with the acid stop bath we use.  (It might be fun to see how
> much a buffered paper sizzles in an acid stop bath.)  I've also read that
> Epson does not buffer EAM because buffering was not consistent with the
> maximizing image permanence -- which was (along with affordability, no
> doubt) a primary goal of EAM.
> 
> I use EAM without much concern for the question of whether it is acid free
> or not.  My conclusion is that image permanence is the more important issue,
> and EAM is hard to beat on that score.  Of the papers I've tested, only
> Eclipse did arguably better -- but it's blacks were not as good.  I also use
> EAM because I like a smooth matte paper, and it produces about the best
> images I've seen.  When these attributes are added to the fact that EAM is
> just plain cheap, it's hard to find a better value.
> 
> If I found that someone was willing to pay big bucks for my prints, but only
> if they were on a more "acid free" paper, I'd gladly print on Eclipse.  To
> date, no one has raised the issue (or offered big bucks for the prints,
> unfortunately).  So, I continue to use EAM.
> 
> Paul
> http://www.PaulRoark.com
> 
> 
> 
> Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other
> resources as they are often being updated. The page is at:
> 
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint
> 
> Please follow these basic guidelines:
> - Include your full name with your message.
> - Include the address of your website, if you have one.
> - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep
> them short.
> - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header.
> - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames."
> - Complete your Yahoo profile.
> - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various
> resources on the homepage.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> 
> 

----------------------
Robert Morrison
rmorrison@...

310-397-2704

4131 Bledsoe Ave.
Los Angeles, CA 90066

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.