> >Austin, > > > >Knowing printer command language, you have got to be the wizard who knows > >what the 240 dpi limiting figure I'm asking about pertains to. > > > > > >thanks, > > > >AZ > >Maker of Lookaround panoramic camera. > >http://www.panoramacamera.us > > or > >keyword.com lookaround > > > > > > Hey wait a minute... > > Could it be that the 240dpi figure had to do with the eyes resolving power > and not anything to do with the printer? In other words below that the dot > pattern become too noticeable for most viewers? > > AZ > > Maker of Lookaround panoramic camera. > http://www.panoramacamera.us > or > keyword.com lookaround Hi Alan, I have no idea what 240DPI "limiting figure" you are talking about...since that is certainly not printer imposed...but probably dither pattern imposed. The Epson dither pattern may in fact have a cap at 240DPI, I don't know and haven't run any experiments (and really have no need to)...but when using the Epson driver in grayscale, it only uses ONE ink, the black ink...and the dither pattern would be pretty large (look like TMax 3200, coarse and chunky ;-). I do know, for a fact, that when using the Piezo driver, I can see differences in prints up to over 480DPI...so that "limit" isn't part of Piezo (or the physical printer). Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Piezo v. Epson resolution -- was (unknown)
2002-05-05 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.