I would agree also. I think part of the problem (for us photographers, silver or digital) is that the DEALERS dont KNOW the differences. They just hone in on keywords like 'archival', 'duotone' and 'platinum' (not that any of those are not important, indeed they are). Yes, they in the business of selling the prints. That does not necessarily mean they know all the terminology, or understand the process by which one arrives at their images. If it sounds different, all the better. Inkjet unfortunately, does not sound 'different' at all, and the original post made some valid points regarding it. Okay, I am starting to ramble here, so I'll just say I agree, it's really the actual images itself that is more important, and utlitmately decides it 'saleability'. Thanks for the interesting post by the way! Take care, Jerry
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Inkjet prints and galleries
2002-05-06 by jhazard68
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.