It has only been recently that photography has been accepted as an art form. As late as the 70's there was the raging debate as to the status of photography as a form or art. While the images produced by the photographers of the old Farm Security Admin, e.g. Lange's "Migrant Worker's Family" and "White Angle, Breadline" and the images produces by may of the photographers for Life magazine, e.g. W. Eugene Smith's work comes to mine they were not originally accepted as anymore than documentation of facts. Now we throw in scanners and digital cameras which capture a computer file. On top of that there is the "digital darkroom" which consist of say Photoshop - a piece of software that one can use to easily remove the imperfections and age lines from the face of a subject and make a person look 20 years younger. With photoshop you can easily mix in portions of different images that will be almost undetectable in the final print. I think the real question is not the final presentation method, convention silver prints vs. inkjet printers, I think the question at what point does digital photography cross the line (fuzzy as it may be) between photography (as most view it) and graphics arts? When a serious buyer looks at a silver based print produced with conventional photographic methods, he knows what he is getting (assuming the craft that goes into the photograph is sufficient). I am not so sure that they are as comfortable with the new digitally produced images. So I feel the question is a little bigger than just the way the final print is produced, inkjet vs. chemistry. That being said I am sure if he were a young man today, Ansel Adams would be at the forefront pushing the techniques of digital photography. It just may take awhile for the photography community to catch up. Truman jhazard68 wrote: > When somebody INVENTS a reason why inkjets should be 'collectible' as > silver base, then they will be accepted. Money, Rarity, Archivalness, > luminance, tonal qualites, all have been successfully argued down in > this thread. Inkjets are a different medium that photography is used > to, so different rules will be invented to apply. We just have to > invent them. interesting. > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Inkjet prints and galleries
2002-05-07 by Truman Prevatt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.