David Myers <dmyers@...> writes:
> I never enter into these discussions and have been sitting back and
> following this thread for about 24 hours. It is very interesting. Doesn't
> it come down to the fact that people will purchase a print when it moves
> them, it has energy and they fall in love with it? My guess is that if
> there was an image that I couldn't take my eyes off of or kept coming back
> to, I would purchase it regardless of whether it was silver based, platinum,
> or printed on an ink-jet. Yes, I would want to make sure of a great degree
> of permanence because I wouldn't want it disappear before my eyes, but any
> art will degrade some over time.
I'm sure that loving a specific image is a primary motivating factor
for most buyers of art, yes.
I'm sure some buyers won't pay as much money for an image of unclear
"collectability", though.
As to permanence -- watercolor paintings have a market, so it would
seem to me that anything that gets up into that range of permanence
can make itself a market. And we think inkjet prints made with
suitable materials are already well past that.
--
David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@... / Ghugle: the Fannish Ghod of Queries
John Dyer-Bennet 1915-2002 Memorial Site http://john.dyer-bennet.net
Book log: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/Ouroboros/booknotes/
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/Message
Re: [Digital BW] Inkjet prints and galleries
2002-05-07 by David Dyer-Bennet
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.