On Wednesday, May 8, 2002, at 08:14 PM, daschkenas@... wrote: > In the new issue of Architectural Digest, I think on page 176, or close > by, > in the description of some of the furniture and art work in the room > pictured > it lists 2 black & white digital prints(photographs) by Robert > Raushenberg. > Upon closer examination they are indeed 2 b&w photos by the artist > obviously > newly printed, digitally. Of course Raushenberg has the reputation and > name > as a traditional artist, so buying "digital" prints from him "must be > accepted as real art" > As several on this list have said, if its digital, but done by a > recognized > artist, there's no problem with the work being viewed as "real > collectable " > art work. > It's not the medium as much as the MAKER. > David Aschkenas > Depends on what you mean as "collectable". For my personal collection I buy platinum and silver prints by Kenna, Sexton, Bresson, Weston and others. I would NOT but a digital print at this time for investment value. Mike
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Digital prints as Fine Art
2002-05-09 by Michael J. Kravit
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.