Scott: I learned to shoot, develop and print on bulk-load TX. Loved it. It was much easier to print than TM400. But scanning those old negs is a hideous struggle because of dust and scratches. I now use factory rolled canisters, TM 400 for an ongoing project, which even when I try to be ultra careful during developing, winds up with time-consuming scratches. For job work (not a lot, so far) I use T400 CN; have a local lab process only, and sleeve the entire roll. This I cut (still sleeved) into six-frame strips. I can examine the frames on a light table and remove the negs only for the length of time it takes to scan. (In this house any negative is a cat hair magnet.) I like what I got and so did my client. Can't offer a scientific comparison, though. Good luck, Carol. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] B&W Films and Scanning
2002-05-16 by wapitiwilla@aol.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.