I use the Kodak Portra BW - it's a chromogenic BW film. I love it. (Mostly because I'm lazy and I hate doing my own film development - years of being a color shooter spoiled me.) The only advantage I see to the chromogenic stuff other than ease of processing is that if you have a scanner with digital ICE or an equivalent (I think canon calls theirs FARE) then you can enable dust/scratch removal - this won't work with "real" BW film, only color/chromogenic films. If you don't care about that, I don't see any reason not to use traditional film. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "smichener" <smichener@y...> wrote: > Hello all, > Does anyone have experiences good or bad with particular black > and white films. I shoot 35mm and have been using Kodak's C-41 > chromogenic BW film and my Canon 4000 dpi scanner. I recently > purchased tanks, chemistry and equipment to begin developing true BW > film (Kodak or Ilford). I was hoping to improve the contrast and > quality of my images. Of course, after my purchase, I have now read > that the C-41 BW film perhaps scans better than true BW film. Any > advice would be appreciated as I have not used any of my new > equipment or many rolls of film. Thank you in advance. > Scott Michener
Message
Re: B&W Films and Scanning
2002-05-16 by charles_bandes
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.