Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: B&W Films and Scanning

2002-05-16 by David Dyer-Bennet

"charles_bandes" <byronbulb@...> writes:

> The only advantage I see to the chromogenic stuff other than ease of
> processing is that if you have a scanner with digital ICE or an
> equivalent (I think canon calls theirs FARE) then you can enable
> dust/scratch removal - this won't work with "real" BW film, only
> color/chromogenic films.
> 
> If you don't care about that, I don't see any reason not to use
> traditional film.

The chromagenic stuff has very different grain characteristics; just
like color film, there's a small dye cloud rather than a sharp-edged
silver grain at each exposed point.  So it's a little bit less sharp,
but has much lower visible grain.  This could be a deciding factor
(either direction) for some photos.
-- 
David Dyer-Bennet, dd-b@...  /  New TMDA anti-spam in test
 John Dyer-Bennet 1915-2002 Memorial Site http://john.dyer-bennet.net
        Book log: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/Ouroboros/booknotes/
                 Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.