Paul Roark wrote: > If the process > is oxidation, then even dark stored prints would be expected to "age," > even > if at a rate that is much slower than one exposed to light. > > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> The process GENERALLY (in acid-free papers) is the result of either light or gaseous interactions. Light induced fading can be tested for by placing the print in a vacuum and exposing it to light.. Gaseous interactions are generally either oxidation or the results of free-radicals (chlorine, ozone, etc.).. That's why the "display behind glass" figures are so pointless to me except as a baseline for generalized comparisons (like EPA gas mileage figures). The amount of gaseous interaction "behind glass" is so reduced from what the average print sees in lits lifetime that it bears little relationship to reality... The sad fact? Most of these gaseous interaction problems have been long known in the dyestuff industry. As an example, the cyan dye disappearance that lays at the heart of the problem with 1270/1280 OEM inks has been know as "Gulf Coast Fading" and recognized in the US chemical indsutry since 1955.. The OEM manufacturers tend to develop inks incrementally, changing colors bit by bit in each inkset to increase longevity.. The problem with the 1270/1280 cyan dye was it had been changed from the previous 6 color inksets to increase lightfastness.. BUT, EPSON never tested for gaseous interactions in general environmental conditions.. They ASSUMED that their changes left that part of the inks characteristics unchanged... DUMB move! But, they "needed to get the product out the door in conjunction with their standard release cycle." AND, as we all know, the real dyes/pigments are not OEM developments... they are developed by the Chemical Companies and simply incorporated into carriers for the particular printers. That's part of why I prefer dealing with ink/chemical companies for my inks. [Keith] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Wilhelm Imaging Web Site
2002-05-22 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.