Hi Todd, > But how 'bout showing us some of your posterized images for our > edification? Well, that is a problem. You need to see prints, not web images... Images can look fine on the screen, but when you print them, they are posterized. > It's most interesting when the same moves are made to a duplicate > 8-bit and > 16-bit file and the two are compared. If you remember my little article on > the topic > (<http://www.ourwebmaster.com/piezography3000/20020106ToddFlashner1.htm>), > which did use a BW image, fairly substantial moves can be made before > deterioration shows. But that is VERY image dependant... > Remember, we only need to retain a max of about 100 > tones for a BW print; which means we can lose 156 out of 256. Actually, no. It depends on WHAT tones you "lose" and where they are. > It's not just if tones get lost, > it's how many, and where in the image, and what type of image. Exactly! Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] 8x16 bits and BW
2002-05-22 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.