Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] 8x16 bits and BW

2002-05-22 by Austin Franklin

Hi Todd,

> But how 'bout showing us some of your posterized images for our
> edification?

Well, that is a problem.  You need to see prints, not web images...  Images
can look fine on the screen, but when you print them, they are posterized.

> It's most interesting when the same moves are made to a duplicate
> 8-bit and
> 16-bit file and the two are compared. If you remember my little article on
> the topic
> (<http://www.ourwebmaster.com/piezography3000/20020106ToddFlashner1.htm>),
> which did use a BW image, fairly substantial moves can be made before
> deterioration shows.

But that is VERY image dependant...

> Remember, we only need to retain a max of about 100
> tones for a BW print; which means we can lose 156 out of 256.

Actually, no.  It depends on WHAT tones you "lose" and where they are.

> It's not just if tones get lost,
> it's how many, and where in the image, and what type of image.

Exactly!

Austin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.